H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Monica Puig vs Jie Zheng H2H: 0-2

Jie Zheng holds a 2–0 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2014 Libéma Open round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jie Zheng #90 6-4 7-5 Monica Puig #51 Match data Jun 19, 2014* R32 Libéma Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Jie Zheng #52 3-6 7-6(10) 7-5 Monica Puig #381 Match data Apr 6, 2011* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,906 218 196 52.7% 0 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Puig Jie Zheng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,506 0 0
19 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0
20 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1 2004 10–18 35.7% #79 1,546 0 0
21 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,702 0 1
22 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,777 0 3
23 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3
24 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2 2008 22–11 66.7% #25 1,845 0 3
25 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,782 0 3
26 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,762 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2 2012 25–24 51.0% #26 1,652 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,687 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Puig Jie Zheng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2003 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2006 12 9 21 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
25 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 19 13 32 59.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 17 15 32 53.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — — 143 126 269 53.2% 48 44 92 52.2% 24 22 46 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 252/279 of Monica Puig's and 286/397 of Jie Zheng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Monica Puig Jie Zheng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7% 2004 5/28 0.2 3.2 67.1% 53.1% 34.7% 39.7% 34.3% 47.4% 39.7%
21 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4% 2005 3/39 0.3 1.7 73.6% 54.5% 45.8% 58.2% 43.9% 52.9% 38.8%
22 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7% 2006 24/41 0.5 2.0 72.3% 57.7% 47.0% 48.1% 46.4% 54.3% 46.5%
23 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8% 2007 16/17 0.5 1.8 71.3% 62.6% 45.3% 56.9% 44.4% 57.9% 45.5%
24 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1% 2008 24/33 1.2 2.0 64.9% 62.6% 48.5% 56.7% 50.6% 57.3% 47.3%
25 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1% 2009 44/48 0.6 2.2 70.2% 61.5% 47.3% 51.4% 52.7% 57.3% 45.8%
26 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8% 2010 39/41 0.5 2.8 69.7% 57.6% 43.9% 55.1% 47.7% 53.4% 45.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 36/41 0.3 2.5 73.5% 57.0% 40.0% 48.0% 48.8% 52.5% 42.9%
28 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7% 2012 38/49 0.5 2.4 68.6% 60.5% 46.7% 49.0% 51.9% 56.3% 44.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 33/34 0.4 2.7 70.4% 56.4% 44.3% 47.0% 46.9% 52.9% 44.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 23/25 0.3 2.0 70.5% 57.6% 42.9% 53.2% 57.7% 53.1% 44.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 3.0 64.7% 48.5% 27.8% 61.5% 14.3% 41.2% 37.9%
Career — 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6% — 286/414 0.5 2.3 70.1% 58.9% 44.8% 51.2% 49.4% 54.7% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Puig Jie Zheng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 2002 1507 104.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–1 — +0.03
19 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09 2003 1536 113.8 — — — — +24 — — 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.41
20 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29 2004 1547 127.3 -2.88 -1.53 0.755 43.6% +22 +39 -34 39.7% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 2–0 — +0.21
21 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38 2005 1702 131.1 -0.46 -1.44 0.823 45.8% -19 -40 — 55.4% +0.42 11–5 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 107.3 -0.22
22 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14 2006 1778 132.0 -1.03 +1.40 1.019 50.5% -50 -22 -207 58.9% +0.37 7–8 (47%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 -0.42
23 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 — 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88 2007 1690 124.7 +1.30 +1.45 1.082 51.4% -13 +33 — 45.9% -0.08 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.7 -0.24
24 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 — — 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76 2008 1845 147.4 +1.86 +3.35 1.109 52.4% -68 -101 -119 59.7% +1.01 7–1 (88%) 2–3 (40%) 107.4 -2.42
25 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89 2009 1782 142.7 +1.41 +2.49 1.073 51.6% +25 -47 -70 54.5% +0.39 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.2 -0.17
26 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 2010 1763 139.6 -1.89 +1.53 0.971 49.4% +49 -45 -75 52.6% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 7–0 (100%) 106.1 +0.54
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1705 120.3 -2.95 -0.51 0.903 47.7% +56 -98 -88 43.9% -0.58 9–9 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.59
28 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14 2012 1653 131.5 +0.57 +1.44 1.024 50.6% +36 -75 +52 49.5% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 -0.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1688 126.6 -2.38 +0.84 0.941 48.5% -1 -50 — 47.5% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 107.5 +0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1670 119.0 -1.86 +0.63 0.939 48.7% -33 -52 +57 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.8 -0.53
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1648 95.9 -0.62 -1.23 0.644 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.16
Career — 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10 — 1906 137.9 -0.68 +1.30 0.991 49.8% +7 -35 -39 50.9% +0.03 73–58 (56%) 47–31 (60%) 109.8 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.