H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Monica Puig vs Kimiko Date H2H: 0-2
Kimiko Date holds a 2–0 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 2014 Birmingham third round 2-6 6-4 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 2-6 6-4 7-6(7) | Monica Puig | Match data | Jun 12, 2014* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass |
| Kimiko Date | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | Monica Puig | Match data | Apr 5, 2014* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | QF | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,841 | 134 | 136 | 49.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Puig | Kimiko Date | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |