H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Monica Puig vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 1-0
Monica Puig holds a 1–0 lead over Mariana Duque-Mariño in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Puig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2015 Toronto second round 6-4 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2017 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Monica Puig | 6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2015* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Monica Puig | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Puig | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |