H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Monica Puig vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0

Monica Puig holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Puig leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2016 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
AUT Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Puig #49 6-4 6-3 Tamira Paszek Match data Jun 11, 2016* QF Nottingham WTA 250 Grass

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,841 134 136 49.6% 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Tamira Paszek #446 #355 173 1,782 100 129 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Puig Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2005 1–1 50.0% 1,512 0 0
15 2006 6–2 75.0% 1,599 0 1
16 2007 15–14 51.7% 1,730 0 1
17 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0 2008 16–18 47.1% 1,697 0 1
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% 1,626 0 1
19 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% 1,642 0 2
20 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,615 0 1 2011 19–21 47.5% 1,654 0 2
21 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,579 0 1 2012 18–21 46.2% 1,676 0 3
22 2016 37–22 62.7% #32 1,794 0 2 2013 2–17 10.5% 1,476 0 3
23 2017 19–21 47.5% #58 1,721 0 2 2014 1–4 20.0% 1,469 0 3
24 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,778 0 2 2015 1–4 20.0% 1,442 0 3
25 2019 16–17 48.5% #79 1,693 0 2 2016 7–9 43.8% 1,519 0 3
26 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,630 0 2
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,625 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Puig Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2005 1 1 2 50.0%
15 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
17 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0%
22 2016 21 12 33 63.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 7 11 18 38.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2022 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 86 90 176 48.9% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7% 68 78 146 46.6% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 253/270 of Monica Puig's and 206/228 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Monica Puig Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 —/— 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 —/— 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8% 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0% 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2016 52/59 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2017 40/40 3.3 3.5 59.9% 65.6% 47.5% 54.0% 45.2% 58.5% 42.6% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2019 33/33 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1% 2016 15/17 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8% —/—
28 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7% —/—
Career 253/270 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6% 206/230 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Puig Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
14 2005 1512 102.6 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 +0.07
15 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +7 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) +0.23
16 2007 1730 133.3 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) -2.41
17 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 -0.15 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) -0.67
18 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% 0.0% -3.00 +0.28 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 -0.09
19 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) -0.10 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) +0.94
20 2014 1616 129.6 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +116 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) +0.65 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -28 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) +0.21
21 2015 1580 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +8 +54 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) -0.28 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) -1.38
22 2016 1794 137.5 +2.33 +1.62 1.092 52.0% -22 -81 -112 59.1% +0.72 10–5 (67%) 3–4 (43%) +0.16 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) +1.07
23 2017 1722 133.1 +2.06 -0.42 1.026 50.5% +15 -61 46.2% -0.09 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) -0.24 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 -0.22
24 2018 1778 137.7 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +8 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) -0.55 2015 1443 101.4 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +33 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 +0.35
25 2019 1694 127.1 +1.67 +0.85 1.076 51.5% -23 +31 -71 50.6% +0.40 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) -0.26 2016 1520 112.8 -3.76 +0.74 0.885 47.2% -43 +197 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 -0.26
26 2020 1630 94.5 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 +0.29
28 2022 1626 101.3 +0.41 +1.05 0.584 39.3% 0.0% -4.00 -0.14
33 2024 1500
Career 1841 134.7 +1.53 -0.07 1.028 50.6% -19 +13 -50 50.1% +0.15 38–49 (44%) 29–34 (46%) -0.13 1783 124.6 -1.94 -0.15 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +138 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) -0.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.