H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Monica Puig vs Vania King H2H: 0-1

Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2013 Guangzhou Open quarterfinal 1-6 7-5 7-6(5).

PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #124 1-6 7-5 7-6(5) Monica Puig #48 Match data Sep 21, 2013* QF Guangzhou Open International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Puig Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1
19 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1
20 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1
21 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1
22 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1
23 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1
24 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Puig Vania King
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7% 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 252/279 of Monica Puig's and 237/288 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Monica Puig Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 —/— 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8% 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0% 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4% 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 —/— 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 —/— 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
Career 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6% 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Puig Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% 40.0% -1.00 1–0 -0.17
17 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 -0.15 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% 0.0% -3.00 +0.17 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23
19 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09
20 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36
21 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43
22 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 +0.30 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% 0.0% -2.00 -0.02
27 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% 0.0% -4.00 -0.14 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 37.5% -0.50 1–1 -0.16
29 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 25.0% -2.25 1–0 +0.17
30 2019 1541 97.5
Career 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.