H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Monica Puig vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-2

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2015 US Open first round 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Venus Williams #23 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 Monica Puig #85 Match data
Apr 4, 2013* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Venus Williams #24 6-2 5-7 6-3 Monica Puig #104 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,838 128 136 48.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Puig Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,464 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,571 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,616 0 1 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,579 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2016 31–22 58.5% #32 1,713 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2017 19–21 47.5% #58 1,709 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,775 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2019 16–17 48.5% #79 1,692 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,629 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 — — — — — — — 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,625 0 1 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47