Home
/
H2H
/
Monica Seles vs Amanda Coetzer
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Monica Seles vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 9-1
Monica Seles holds a 9–1 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2000 WTA Finals quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
9
–
1
10 main-draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Monica Seles
#4
6-3 6-4
Amanda Coetzer
#12
Match data
Nov 18, 2000*
QF
WTA Finals
WTA Finals
Carpet
Monica Seles
#14
6-1 6-2
Amanda Coetzer
#16
Match data
Feb 26, 2000*
SF
Oklahoma
Tier III
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Carpet
Monica Seles
#5
6-2 6-1
Amanda Coetzer
#7
Match data
Aug 28, 1999*
QF
New Haven
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Monica Seles
#4
6-3 6-0
Amanda Coetzer
#13
Match data
Apr 10, 1999*
QF
Amelia Island
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Clay
Amanda Coetzer
#15
6-4 6-2
Monica Seles
#4
Match data
Feb 6, 1999*
SF
Pan Pacific Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Carpet
Monica Seles
#3
6-3 6-4
Amanda Coetzer
#6
Match data
Aug 2, 1997*
SF
San Diego
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Monica Seles
#1
6-0 6-3
Amanda Coetzer
#17
Match data
Sep 5, 1996*
QF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Monica Seles
#1
6-0 6-1
Amanda Coetzer
#27
Match data
Aug 20, 1995*
F
Canadian Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Monica Seles
#1
6-0 6-4
Amanda Coetzer
#31
Match data
May 9, 1992*
SF
Italian Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Clay
Monica Seles
#1
6-4 6-1
Amanda Coetzer
#100
Match data
Aug 16, 1991*
R16
Manhattan Beach
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Monica Seles
#223
#1
4,056
2,540
586
123
82.7%
9
9
3
21
11
53
Amanda Coetzer
#289
#3
3,380
2,052
497
310
61.6%
0
1
0
1
7
9
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
14
1988
5–3
62.5%
#86
1,599
0
0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15
1989
33–9
78.6%
#6
2,005
0
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16
1990
55–6
90.2%
#2
2,296
1
10
1988
3–2
60.0%
#152
1,536
0
0
17
1991
74–6
92.5%
#1
2,444
4
20
1989
16–13
55.2%
#63
1,674
0
0
18
1992
70–5
93.3%
#1
2,500
7
30
1990
16–19
45.7%
#76
1,662
0
0
19
1993
17–2
89.5%
#8
2,486
8
32
1991
15–19
44.1%
#68
1,685
0
0
20
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1992
37–16
69.8%
#17
1,865
0
0
21
1995
11–1
91.7%
#1
2,488
8
33
1993
42–18
70.0%
#15
1,994
0
2
22
1996
46–9
83.6%
#2
2,344
9
38
1994
38–19
66.7%
#18
1,886
0
3
23
1997
45–14
76.3%
#5
2,180
9
41
1995
31–22
58.5%
#19
1,907
0
3
24
1998
42–13
76.4%
#6
2,180
9
43
1996
32–21
60.4%
#14
1,855
0
3
25
1999
36–12
75.0%
#6
2,120
9
44
1997
60–25
70.6%
#4
2,014
0
5
26
2000
56–13
81.2%
#4
2,153
9
47
1998
32–23
58.2%
#17
1,888
0
6
27
2001
40–10
80.0%
#10
2,132
9
51
1999
37–25
59.7%
#11
1,816
0
6
28
2002
46–13
78.0%
#7
2,091
9
53
2000
47–23
67.1%
#12
1,894
0
7
29
2003
10–7
58.8%
#60
1,994
9
53
2001
32–21
60.4%
#19
1,786
0
8
30
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2002
30–22
57.7%
#21
1,794
0
8
31
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2003
27–19
58.7%
#25
1,738
0
9
32
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2004
2–3
40.0%
#286
1,718
0
9
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
14
1988
5
3
8
62.5%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15
1989
6
2
8
75.0%
10
1
11
90.9%
3
1
4
75.0%
14
5
19
73.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16
1990
18
2
20
90.0%
22
0
22
100.0%
4
1
5
80.0%
11
3
14
78.6%
1988
1
1
2
50.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17
1991
40
3
43
93.0%
19
2
21
90.5%
—
—
—
—
15
1
16
93.8%
1989
7
5
12
58.3%
8
6
14
57.1%
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
18
1992
33
3
36
91.7%
19
1
20
95.0%
6
1
7
85.7%
12
0
12
100.0%
1990
11
11
22
50.0%
4
5
9
44.4%
1
2
3
33.3%
0
1
1
0.0%
19
1993
11
1
12
91.7%
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
4
0
4
100.0%
1991
9
11
20
45.0%
5
6
11
45.5%
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
20
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1992
20
8
28
71.4%
16
7
23
69.6%
—
—
—
—
1
1
2
50.0%
21
1995
11
1
12
91.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1993
25
8
33
75.8%
11
5
16
68.8%
2
2
4
50.0%
4
3
7
57.1%
22
1996
29
2
31
93.5%
6
2
8
75.0%
5
1
6
83.3%
6
4
10
60.0%
1994
21
11
32
65.6%
12
4
16
75.0%
3
1
4
75.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
23
1997
27
5
32
84.4%
13
4
17
76.5%
3
2
5
60.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
1995
14
11
25
56.0%
10
6
16
62.5%
1
1
2
50.0%
6
4
10
60.0%
24
1998
20
5
25
80.0%
11
4
15
73.3%
4
1
5
80.0%
7
3
10
70.0%
1996
25
12
37
67.6%
6
4
10
60.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
0
4
4
0.0%
25
1999
21
7
28
75.0%
11
2
13
84.6%
2
2
4
50.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
1997
22
13
35
62.9%
27
7
34
79.4%
1
1
2
50.0%
10
4
14
71.4%
26
2000
28
9
37
75.7%
17
2
19
89.5%
4
1
5
80.0%
7
1
8
87.5%
1998
16
11
27
59.3%
10
5
15
66.7%
1
2
3
33.3%
5
5
10
50.0%
27
2001
36
9
45
80.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
4
0
4
100.0%
1999
23
14
37
62.2%
6
6
12
50.0%
4
2
6
66.7%
4
3
7
57.1%
28
2002
27
8
35
77.1%
9
2
11
81.8%
4
1
5
80.0%
6
2
8
75.0%
2000
19
12
31
61.3%
19
5
24
79.2%
2
2
4
50.0%
7
4
11
63.6%
29
2003
4
3
7
57.1%
3
3
6
50.0%
—
—
—
—
3
1
4
75.0%
2001
13
11
24
54.2%
16
6
22
72.7%
2
2
4
50.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
30
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2002
20
13
33
60.6%
5
5
10
50.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
4
2
6
66.7%
31
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2003
17
11
28
60.7%
8
4
12
66.7%
2
2
4
50.0%
0
2
2
0.0%
32
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2004
2
2
4
50.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
316
63
379
83.4%
142
25
167
85.0%
35
11
46
76.1%
93
24
117
79.5%
—
265
165
430
61.6%
165
83
248
66.5%
23
24
47
48.9%
44
38
82
53.7%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.