H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Monica Seles vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 2-0

Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Roland Garros second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 30, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Monica Seles #6 6-4 6-1 Barbara Rittner #86 Match data
Sep 1, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Monica Seles #4 6-1 6-1 Barbara Rittner #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 — — — — — — —
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2