H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Monica Seles vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 5-1

Monica Seles holds a 5–1 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1997 Philadelphia fourth round 4-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 14, 1997* Philadelphia WTA 250 R16 Carpet Monica Seles #5 4-3 (ret.) Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #16 Match data
Jun 22, 1997* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #15 7-5 7-5 Monica Seles #2 Match data
Jan 13, 1996* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Monica Seles #1 7-6 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #13 Match data
Feb 13, 1993* Chicago WTA 250 QF Carpet Monica Seles #1 4-6 7-6 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #30 Match data
Oct 12, 1989* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Carpet Monica Seles #9 4-6 6-3 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #69 Match data
Jun 28, 1989* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Monica Seles #14 7-6 1-6 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7