H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Monica Seles vs Chris Evert H2H: 1-2

Chris Evert holds a 2–1 lead over Monica Seles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Monica Seles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1989 US Open fourth round 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 5, 1989* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Chris Evert #4 6-0 6-2 Monica Seles #12 Match data
Apr 30, 1989* Houston WTA 250 F Clay Monica Seles #52 3-6 6-1 6-4 Chris Evert #4 Match data
Mar 10, 1988* Boca Raton WTA 250 R32 Hard Chris Evert #3 6-2 6-1 Monica Seles Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39
20 — — — — — — — 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122
30 — — — — — — — 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131
31 — — — — — — — 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137
32 — — — — — — — 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142
33 — — — — — — — 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146
34 — — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146