H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Monica Seles vs Erika De Lone H2H: 3-0

Monica Seles holds a 3–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2000 Hilton Head round of 32 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Seles #7 6-0 6-0 Erika De Lone #70 Match data Apr 20, 2000* R32 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-1 Erika De Lone #113 Match data Aug 31, 1995* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-0 Erika De Lone #127 Match data Mar 30, 1991* QF San Antonio Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Erika De Lone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0
22 1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0
26 2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Seles Erika De Lone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — 15 1 16 93.8% 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1995 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5% — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Seles Erika De Lone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1600 134.7 — — — — +49 — — 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 2005 170.5 — — — — -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 107.2 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 2297 179.4 — — — — -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) 110.0 -3.90 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43
17 1991 2445 183.7 — — — — 0 -66 — 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 105.2 -3.24 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36
18 1992 2501 182.5 — — — — +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) 107.7 -2.26 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39
19 1993 2486 173.2 — — — — +21 -78 — 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.84 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69
21 1995 2488 169.9 — — — — +5 — — 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.63 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52
22 1996 2344 176.3 — — — — +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 96.5 -0.42 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88
23 1997 2181 174.0 — — — — +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 90.3 -0.17 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33
24 1998 2180 173.5 — — — — +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 -1.32 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34
25 1999 2120 173.1 — — — — +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -0.29 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26
26 2000 2153 175.3 — — — — +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 106.4 -2.96 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34
27 2001 2132 162.9 — — — — +27 — — 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 95.6 +1.21 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13
28 2002 2091 167.1 — — — — +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 -1.76 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32
29 2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 — 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -0.67 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08
Career — 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62 — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.