H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Monica Seles holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Bes Ostariz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Wimbledon round of 128 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | 6-0 6-0 | Eva Bes Ostariz | Match data | Jun 26, 2002* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 586 | 123 | 82.7% | 9 | 9 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 53 |
| Eva Bes Ostariz | — | — | — | 1,523 | 14 | 28 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Seles | Eva Bes Ostariz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,296 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,444 | 4 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,500 | 7 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,486 | 8 | 32 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,488 | 8 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 46–9 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,344 | 9 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,180 | 9 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,180 | 9 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,120 | 9 | 44 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #4 | 2,153 | 9 | 47 | 1999 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,132 | 9 | 51 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,091 | 9 | 53 | 2001 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,994 | 9 | 53 | 2002 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Monica Seles | Eva Bes Ostariz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1988 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 18 | 2 | 20 | 90.0% | 22 | 0 | 22 | 100.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 40 | 3 | 43 | 93.0% | 19 | 2 | 21 | 90.5% | — | — | — | — | 15 | 1 | 16 | 93.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 33 | 3 | 36 | 91.7% | 19 | 1 | 20 | 95.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 12 | 0 | 12 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 29 | 2 | 31 | 93.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 27 | 5 | 32 | 84.4% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 20 | 5 | 25 | 80.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2000 | 28 | 9 | 37 | 75.7% | 17 | 2 | 19 | 89.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 36 | 9 | 45 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | 2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 27 | 8 | 35 | 77.1% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 316 | 63 | 379 | 83.4% | 142 | 25 | 167 | 85.0% | 35 | 11 | 46 | 76.1% | 93 | 24 | 117 | 79.5% | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 13 | 24 | 37 | 35.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Monica Seles | Eva Bes Ostariz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1600 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | — | 58.8% | +0.29 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 2005 | 170.5 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -209 | -385 | 75.8% | +2.03 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–4 (43%) | 107.2 | -0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 2297 | 179.4 | — | — | — | — | -85 | -99 | -561 | 84.8% | +2.78 | 7–3 (70%) | 7–1 (88%) | 110.0 | -3.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 2445 | 183.7 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -66 | — | 86.9% | +3.17 | 10–3 (77%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.2 | -3.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 2501 | 182.5 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -35 | -586 | 88.2% | +3.24 | 10–1 (91%) | 2–2 (50%) | 107.7 | -2.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 2486 | 173.2 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -78 | — | 85.4% | +3.27 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.84 | 1992 | 1475 | 96.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 21 | 1995 | 2488 | 169.9 | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | — | 92.0% | +3.80 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 2344 | 176.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | +5 | -308 | 83.5% | +2.58 | 4–3 (57%) | 8–3 (73%) | 96.5 | -0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 2181 | 174.0 | — | — | — | — | +75 | +103 | -181 | 72.3% | +1.95 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–9 (40%) | 90.3 | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 2180 | 173.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +77 | -125 | 70.2% | +1.77 | 10–5 (67%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.0 | -1.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 2120 | 173.1 | — | — | — | — | +56 | +123 | -164 | 73.3% | +2.05 | 3–2 (60%) | 5–5 (50%) | 97.5 | -0.29 | 1998 | 1474 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.25 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2153 | 175.3 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +110 | -86 | 78.0% | +2.03 | 9–5 (64%) | 12–1 (92%) | 106.4 | -2.96 | 1999 | 1434 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | 31.6% | -1.16 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.48 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2132 | 162.9 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 73.5% | +1.72 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–5 (50%) | 95.6 | +1.21 | 2000 | 1412 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.10 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2091 | 167.1 | — | — | — | — | +54 | +166 | +47 | 70.1% | +1.67 | 14–4 (78%) | 6–7 (46%) | 102.1 | -1.76 | 2001 | 1508 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | 51.7% | +0.14 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.60 |
| 29 | 2003 | 1995 | 139.5 | +0.40 | +1.10 | 0.702 | 40.9% | +112 | +183 | — | 56.8% | +0.57 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.7 | -0.67 | 2002 | 1485 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 33.3% | -1.48 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–0 | — | -0.01 |
| Career | — | 2541 | 181.1 | +0.40 | +1.10 | 0.702 | 40.9% | +21 | +17 | -276 | 78.2% | +2.32 | 102–45 (69%) | 69–52 (57%) | 102.4 | -2.62 | — | 1523 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | 36.4% | -0.94 | 7–8 (47%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.5 | +2.31 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 18 | 3 | 21 | Mar 6, 2002 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 5 | 15 | 20 | Sep 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 17 | 1 | 18 | Mar 20, 2002 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 10 | 7 | 17 | Feb 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | 15 | 1 | 16 | Jun 5, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Torrens Valero | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 1, 2002 | H2H |
| Rita Kuti-Kis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 18, 2002 | H2H |
| Angeles Montolio | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 4, 2002 | H2H |
| Aniko Kapros | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 8, 2002 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 26, 2002 | H2H |