H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Monica Seles vs Helena Sukova H2H: 2-0

Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Helena Sukova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1991 Milan quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 1991* Milan WTA 250 QF Carpet Monica Seles #1 6-3 6-4 Helena Sukova #14 Match data
May 4, 1991* Hamburg WTA 250 QF Clay Monica Seles #1 6-0 6-1 Helena Sukova #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,217 580 297 66.1% 0 1 0 3 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Helena Sukova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,583 0 0
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,757 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,907 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1986 69–21 76.7% #6 2,151 0 3
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1988 49–19 72.1% #8 2,120 0 5
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,043 0 6
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,025 0 6
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 1992 38–15 71.7% #12 1,976 0 9
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,925 0 9
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,889 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1996 17–15 53.1% #35 1,792 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,661 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,637 0 9