H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Monica Seles vs Joannette Kruger H2H: 1-0
Monica Seles holds a 1–0 lead over Joannette Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1998 US Open second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 52
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-2 6-3 | Joannette Kruger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
| Joannette Kruger | #972 | #21 | 1,280 | 1,879 | 147 | 162 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Seles | Joannette Kruger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 | 1993 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #79 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 | 1997 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,791 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 | 1998 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #129 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 | 2000 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #59 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 | 2001 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #46 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #455 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #853 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |