H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Monica Seles vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 5-1

Monica Seles holds a 5–1 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 2000 Tokyo semifinal 6-4 4-3 RET.

USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 2000* Tokyo WTA 500 SF Hard Julie Halard-Decugis #19 6-4 4-3 (ret.) Monica Seles #5 Match data
Jun 1, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Monica Seles #3 6-1 7-5 Julie Halard-Decugis #19 Match data
Sep 26, 1998* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Monica Seles #6 6-2 6-1 Julie Halard-Decugis #29 Match data
Jan 21, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Monica Seles #1 7-5 6-0 Julie Halard-Decugis #37 Match data
Jan 29, 1993* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-7(5) 6-0 Julie Halard-Decugis #29 Match data
Nov 18, 1991 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Monica Seles #1 6-1 6-0 Julie Halard-Decugis #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0
20 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12