H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Monica Seles vs Karin Kschwendt H2H: 3-0

Monica Seles holds a 3–0 lead over Karin Kschwendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1992 Roland Garros round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Karin Kschwendt
AUT Age 58 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-2 Karin Kschwendt #200 Match data May 28, 1992* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Monica Seles #1 6-0 6-1 Karin Kschwendt #79 Match data Mar 18, 1991* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Monica Seles #2 6-3 6-1 Karin Kschwendt #118 Match data Jan 20, 1991* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53
Karin Kschwendt #507 #37 426 1,712 79 116 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Karin Kschwendt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10 — — — — — — —
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20 — — — — — — —
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30 — — — — — — —
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 1989 3–9 25.0% #178 1,476 0 0
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33 1990 6–9 40.0% #116 1,499 0 0
22 1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38 1991 15–18 45.5% #88 1,569 0 0
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41 1992 4–7 36.4% #77 1,574 0 0
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43 1993 15–16 48.4% #81 1,598 0 0
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44 1994 9–15 37.5% #99 1,610 0 0
26 2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47 1995 10–13 43.5% #85 1,605 0 0
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51 1996 15–14 51.7% #53 1,658 0 0
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53 1997 1–12 7.7% #172 1,536 0 0
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53 1998 1–2 33.3% #139 1,534 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #413 1,516 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Seles Karin Kschwendt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1991 12 10 22 54.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 9 7 16 56.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 5 10 15 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1997 1 7 8 12.5% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5% — 43 55 98 43.9% 26 40 66 39.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 13 19 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Seles Karin Kschwendt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1600 134.7 — — — — +49 — — 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 2005 170.5 — — — — -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 107.2 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 2297 179.4 — — — — -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) 110.0 -3.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 2445 183.7 — — — — 0 -66 — 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 105.2 -3.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 2501 182.5 — — — — +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) 107.7 -2.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 2486 173.2 — — — — +21 -78 — 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1477 108.7 — — — — +1 +93 — 28.6% -1.21 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 99.0 +0.60
21 1995 2488 169.9 — — — — +5 — — 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.63 1990 1500 116.8 — — — — -22 +27 +132 41.7% -0.22 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.3 +1.10
22 1996 2344 176.3 — — — — +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 96.5 -0.42 1991 1570 131.4 — — — — -8 -8 — 49.3% -0.11 4–7 (36%) 6–2 (75%) 100.2 -0.70
23 1997 2181 174.0 — — — — +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 90.3 -0.17 1992 1575 122.9 — — — — — +34 — 41.7% -0.58 0–2 0–2 — +0.11
24 1998 2180 173.5 — — — — +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 -1.32 1993 1599 127.8 — — — — +18 -14 — 52.8% +0.60 4–8 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.30
25 1999 2120 173.1 — — — — +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -0.29 1994 1611 123.8 — — — — -13 +13 — 39.3% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.22
26 2000 2153 175.3 — — — — +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 106.4 -2.96 1995 1606 119.9 — — — — -36 +45 -50 41.7% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.29
27 2001 2132 162.9 — — — — +27 — — 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 95.6 +1.21 1996 1659 133.2 — — — — +16 -26 -78 47.7% -0.05 6–1 (86%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.27
28 2002 2091 167.1 — — — — +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 -1.76 1997 1536 106.7 — — — — +44 +39 — 17.2% -2.17 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.89
29 2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 — 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -0.67 1998 1534 104.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -0.88 1–1 — — +0.24
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1516 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.14
Career — 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62 — 1713 130.2 — — — — +1 +22 +1 42.7% -0.41 26–35 (43%) 14–20 (41%) 95.1 +0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.