H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Monica Seles vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-0
Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1992 Key Biscayne third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-0 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1989 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-0 6-2 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Monica Seles | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |