H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Monica Seles vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 4-0

Monica Seles holds a 4–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1992 Toronto semifinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 1992 Toronto WTA 1000 SF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-3 6-4 Lori Mcneil #22 Match data
May 31, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Monica Seles #1 6-0 6-1 Lori Mcneil #27 Match data
Oct 20, 1989* Zurich WTA 250 R16 Carpet Monica Seles #9 7-6 6-2 Lori Mcneil #23 Match data
Oct 8, 1988* New Orleans WTA 250 QF Hard Monica Seles 6-1 6-3 Lori Mcneil #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11