H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Monica Seles vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 3-0

Monica Seles holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1993 Hamburg Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
SWE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-2 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data Apr 29, 1993* R32 Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-0 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data Jan 22, 1993* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Seles #3 6-2 6-0 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data Jun 27, 1990* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik — — — 1,625 42 77 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Monica Seles Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1 1988 6–7 46.2% — 1,578 0 0
1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10 1989 10–14 41.7% — 1,611 0 0
1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20 1990 7–16 30.4% — 1,588 0 0
1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30 1991 6–12 33.3% — 1,553 0 0
1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32 1992 0–3 0.0% — 1,520 0 0
1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33 1993 2–3 40.0% — 1,559 0 0
1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38 1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,546 0 0
1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41 1995 8–13 38.1% — 1,545 0 0
1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43 1996 2–5 28.6% — 1,526 0 0
1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,515 0 0
2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47 — — — — — — —
2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51 — — — — — — —
2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53 — — — — — — —
2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Monica Seles Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1988 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — 15 1 16 93.8% 1990 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1995 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5% Career 19 28 47 40.4% 14 30 44 31.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 10 13 23.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Monica Seles Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1988 1600 134.7 — — — — +49 — — 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.41 1987 1504 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.20 0–1 — — +0.37
1989 2005 170.5 — — — — -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 107.2 -0.76 1988 1578 125.8 — — — — +10 -8 — 45.5% -0.15 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 102.9 +0.45
1990 2297 179.4 — — — — -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) 110.0 -3.90 1989 1612 115.4 — — — — -1 -33 — 44.3% -0.85 6–7 (46%) 1–1 — +0.30
1991 2445 183.7 — — — — 0 -66 — 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 105.2 -3.24 1990 1589 112.6 — — — — +13 -55 — 32.7% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 0–5 (0%) 99.0 -0.92
1992 2501 182.5 — — — — +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) 107.7 -2.26 1991 1554 113.6 — — — — -13 -34 +68 35.7% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 -0.11
1993 2486 173.2 — — — — +21 -78 — 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.84 1992 1520 104.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.32
1995 2488 169.9 — — — — +5 — — 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.63 1993 1560 135.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 0–1 — -0.82
1996 2344 176.3 — — — — +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 96.5 -0.42 1994 1546 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.30
1997 2181 174.0 — — — — +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 90.3 -0.17 1995 1545 114.4 — — — — +8 -11 +27 40.8% -0.86 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.97
1998 2180 173.5 — — — — +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 -1.32 1996 1527 113.8 — — — — +25 — — 33.3% -0.60 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
1999 2120 173.1 — — — — +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -0.29 1997 1515 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.13
2000 2153 175.3 — — — — +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 106.4 -2.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2001 2132 162.9 — — — — +27 — — 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 95.6 +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 2091 167.1 — — — — +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 -1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 — 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62 Career 1625 123.4 — — — — +6 -29 +45 38.2% -0.87 23–24 (49%) 6–16 (27%) 97.8 -1.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.