H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Monica Seles vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 1-0
Monica Seles holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1989 Houston third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1989* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Monica Seles | 6-2 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Monica Seles | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |