H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Monica Seles vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 5-1

Monica Seles holds a 5–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1998 Philadelphia quarterfinal 6-0 6-1.

USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 14, 1998* Philadelphia WTA 250 QF Carpet Monica Seles #6 6-0 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #16 Match data
Jul 3, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Natasha Zvereva #22 7-6 6-2 Monica Seles #5 Match data
Apr 3, 1998* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Monica Seles #6 6-0 6-7 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #21 Match data
Sep 20, 1997* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Monica Seles #3 6-1 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #25 Match data
Aug 9, 1997* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Monica Seles #3 6-1 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #27 Match data
Aug 2, 1997* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Monica Seles #3 6-1 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
31 2002 0–1 0.0% 1,733 0 5