H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Monica Seles vs Radomira Zrubakova H2H: 4-0

Monica Seles holds a 4–0 lead over Radomira Zrubakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1992 Key Biscayne fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Radomira Zrubakova
SVK Age 55 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 17, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Monica Seles #1 6-1 6-2 Radomira Zrubakova #26 Match data
May 29, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Monica Seles #1 6-3 6-0 Radomira Zrubakova #26 Match data
Apr 19, 1991* Houston WTA 250 R16 Clay Monica Seles #1 6-0 6-2 Radomira Zrubakova #62 Match data
May 10, 1990* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Monica Seles #4 6-4 6-1 Radomira Zrubakova #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Radomira Zrubakova #788 #22 324 1,896 171 155 52.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Radomira Zrubakova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1987 4–4 50.0% #139 1,551 0 0
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1988 27–16 62.8% #32 1,776 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1989 22–13 62.9% #32 1,807 0 1
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1990 16–18 47.1% #57 1,723 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1991 33–20 62.3% #23 1,821 0 2
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1992 30–18 62.5% #28 1,817 0 3
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1993 12–21 36.4% #94 1,663 0 3
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1994 8–11 42.1% #76 1,628 0 3
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1995 8–12 40.0% #92 1,621 0 3
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1996 5–11 31.2% #86 1,569 0 3
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1997 6–11 35.3% #125 1,564 0 3
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 — — — — — — —
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 — — — — — — —
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 — — — — — — —