H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Monica Seles vs Rita Grande H2H: 3-0
Monica Seles holds a 3–0 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2001 Japan Open quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2001* | Japan Open | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-1 6-2 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1997* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-0 6-0 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1997* | Stanford | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-2 6-1 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Seles | Rita Grande | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 |