H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Monica Seles vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 3-1

Monica Seles holds a 3–1 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1990 US Open second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 1990* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Monica Seles #3 6-2 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank #25 Match data
Apr 2, 1990* San Antonio WTA 250 SF Hard Monica Seles #4 6-3 6-0 Rosalyn Fairbank #17 Match data
Mar 20, 1990* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Monica Seles #6 6-3 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank #21 Match data
Feb 15, 1990* Chicago WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank #27 6-3 6-4 Monica Seles #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 — — — — — — —
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1