H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Monica Seles vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 3-0

Monica Seles holds a 3–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1991 Roland Garros fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 4, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Monica Seles #1 3-6 6-3 6-0 Sandra Cecchini #22 Match data
Apr 20, 1991* Houston WTA 250 SF Clay Monica Seles #1 6-0 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #23 Match data
May 19, 1990* Berlin WTA 1000 SF Clay Monica Seles #3 6-1 6-3 Sandra Cecchini #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11