H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Monica Seles vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 2-0

Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Monica Seles #3 6-2 6-2 Silvija Talaja #18 Match data
Mar 2, 2000* Scottsdale WTA 500 R32 Hard Monica Seles #9 6-1 7-6 Silvija Talaja #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 130 151 46.3% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,588 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,555 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,603 0 0
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,700 0 0
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 2000 24–27 47.1% #29 1,647 0 2
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,543 0 2
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,559 0 2
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,543 0 2
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 — — — — — — —
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 — — — — — — —