H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Monica Seles vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 2-0

Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Stephanie Rehe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1992 Oakland round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Rehe
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Seles #1 6-4 6-1 Stephanie Rehe #64 Match data Nov 6, 1992* R16 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Monica Seles #3 6-1 6-2 Stephanie Rehe #108 Match data Nov 3, 1990* QF Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53
Stephanie Rehe #156 #10 60 2,005 134 98 57.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Stephanie Rehe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
11 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1983 0–4 0.0% — 1,472 0 0
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0 1984 1–5 16.7% #182 1,461 0 0
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1 1985 23–12 65.7% #18 1,805 0 2
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10 1986 25–16 61.0% #19 1,823 0 2
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20 1987 17–8 68.0% #28 1,868 0 3
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30 1988 43–19 69.4% #14 1,970 0 5
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 1990 7–6 53.8% #58 1,972 0 5
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33 1991 5–12 29.4% #123 1,768 0 5
22 1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38 1992 9–13 40.9% #74 1,746 0 5
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41 1993 3–2 60.0% #156 1,759 0 5
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43 — — — — — — —
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44 — — — — — — —
26 2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47 — — — — — — —
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51 — — — — — — —
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53 — — — — — — —
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Seles Stephanie Rehe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 1988 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1986 15 8 23 65.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
17 1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — 15 1 16 93.8% 1987 10 3 13 76.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0% 1988 33 14 47 70.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
19 1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1995 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5% — 89 52 141 63.1% 12 17 29 41.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 28 21 49 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Seles Stephanie Rehe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1502 97.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — — — 0.00
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1472 101.2 — — — — — +53 — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–2 — -0.11
14 1988 1600 134.7 — — — — +49 — — 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.41 1984 1461 107.5 — — — — +98 — — 33.3% -1.27 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
15 1989 2005 170.5 — — — — -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 107.2 -0.76 1985 1805 137.6 — — — — +30 — -204 66.2% +1.22 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 +1.03
16 1990 2297 179.4 — — — — -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) 110.0 -3.90 1986 1824 143.8 — — — — +5 -244 — 59.8% +0.59 9–8 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 99.5 -0.44
17 1991 2445 183.7 — — — — 0 -66 — 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 105.2 -3.24 1987 1868 140.6 — — — — +24 -213 — 66.7% +0.83 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 107.0 -1.01
18 1992 2501 182.5 — — — — +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) 107.7 -2.26 1988 1971 150.3 — — — — +36 -321 -361 63.4% +0.84 16–4 (80%) 9–7 (56%) 109.5 +1.45
19 1993 2486 173.2 — — — — +21 -78 — 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1972 150.4 — — — — +13 — — 48.4% -0.35 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -2.64
21 1995 2488 169.9 — — — — +5 — — 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.63 1991 1768 119.9 — — — — +127 -164 -189 37.5% -0.45 1–5 (17%) 1–7 (13%) 88.2 +0.02
22 1996 2344 176.3 — — — — +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 96.5 -0.42 1992 1746 139.7 — — — — +45 — — 44.0% -0.42 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.1 -2.65
23 1997 2181 174.0 — — — — +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 90.3 -0.17 1993 1759 118.2 — — — — +25 — — 70.0% +2.00 1–1 — — -0.09
24 1998 2180 173.5 — — — — +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 2120 173.1 — — — — +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 2153 175.3 — — — — +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 106.4 -2.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 2132 162.9 — — — — +27 — — 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 95.6 +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 2091 167.1 — — — — +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 -1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 — 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62 — 2005 148.4 — — — — +33 -192 -247 57.2% +0.47 39–35 (53%) 27–34 (44%) 96.6 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.