H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Monica Seles holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Sloane Lundy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1990 Tampa quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | 6-2 6-0 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data | Apr 21, 1990* | QF | Tampa | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 586 | 123 | 82.7% | 9 | 9 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 53 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,882 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Monica Seles | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,296 | 1 | 10 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,444 | 4 | 20 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,500 | 7 | 30 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,486 | 8 | 32 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,488 | 8 | 33 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 46–9 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,344 | 9 | 38 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,180 | 9 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,180 | 9 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,120 | 9 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #4 | 2,153 | 9 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,132 | 9 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,091 | 9 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,994 | 9 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Monica Seles | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1988 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 1986 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1990 | 18 | 2 | 20 | 90.0% | 22 | 0 | 22 | 100.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 1987 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 40 | 3 | 43 | 93.0% | 19 | 2 | 21 | 90.5% | — | — | — | — | 15 | 1 | 16 | 93.8% | 1988 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 1992 | 33 | 3 | 36 | 91.7% | 19 | 1 | 20 | 95.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 12 | 0 | 12 | 100.0% | 1989 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | 1990 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1995 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 29 | 2 | 31 | 93.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1992 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 27 | 5 | 32 | 84.4% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 20 | 5 | 25 | 80.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 28 | 9 | 37 | 75.7% | 17 | 2 | 19 | 89.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 36 | 9 | 45 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 27 | 8 | 35 | 77.1% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 316 | 63 | 379 | 83.4% | 142 | 25 | 167 | 85.0% | 35 | 11 | 46 | 76.1% | 93 | 24 | 117 | 79.5% | Career | 66 | 62 | 128 | 51.6% | 21 | 22 | 43 | 48.8% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Monica Seles | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1988 | 1600 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | — | 58.8% | +0.29 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.41 | 1985 | 1485 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.22 |
| 1989 | 2005 | 170.5 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -209 | -385 | 75.8% | +2.03 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–4 (43%) | 107.2 | -0.76 | 1986 | 1596 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -38 | — | 43.5% | -0.37 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.3 | -0.48 |
| 1990 | 2297 | 179.4 | — | — | — | — | -85 | -99 | -561 | 84.8% | +2.78 | 7–3 (70%) | 7–1 (88%) | 110.0 | -3.90 | 1987 | 1636 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -71 | — | 39.3% | -0.80 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | 105.9 | -1.68 |
| 1991 | 2445 | 183.7 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -66 | — | 86.9% | +3.17 | 10–3 (77%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.2 | -3.24 | 1988 | 1846 | 136.9 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -203 | — | 53.0% | +0.20 | 11–2 (85%) | 3–1 (75%) | 113.8 | -0.25 |
| 1992 | 2501 | 182.5 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -35 | -586 | 88.2% | +3.24 | 10–1 (91%) | 2–2 (50%) | 107.7 | -2.26 | 1989 | 1755 | 137.6 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -18 | — | 57.9% | +0.67 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.8 | -0.26 |
| 1993 | 2486 | 173.2 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -78 | — | 85.4% | +3.27 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.84 | 1990 | 1782 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -73 | — | 56.5% | +0.31 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–5 (44%) | 99.8 | -0.62 |
| 1995 | 2488 | 169.9 | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | — | 92.0% | +3.80 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | 1991 | 1653 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -8 | — | 46.3% | -0.46 | 1–5 (17%) | — | — | +0.61 |
| 1996 | 2344 | 176.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | +5 | -308 | 83.5% | +2.58 | 4–3 (57%) | 8–3 (73%) | 96.5 | -0.42 | 1992 | 1580 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.63 | — | — | — | -0.33 |
| 1997 | 2181 | 174.0 | — | — | — | — | +75 | +103 | -181 | 72.3% | +1.95 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–9 (40%) | 90.3 | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 2180 | 173.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +77 | -125 | 70.2% | +1.77 | 10–5 (67%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.0 | -1.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2120 | 173.1 | — | — | — | — | +56 | +123 | -164 | 73.3% | +2.05 | 3–2 (60%) | 5–5 (50%) | 97.5 | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 2153 | 175.3 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +110 | -86 | 78.0% | +2.03 | 9–5 (64%) | 12–1 (92%) | 106.4 | -2.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 2132 | 162.9 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 73.5% | +1.72 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–5 (50%) | 95.6 | +1.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 2091 | 167.1 | — | — | — | — | +54 | +166 | +47 | 70.1% | +1.67 | 14–4 (78%) | 6–7 (46%) | 102.1 | -1.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1995 | 139.5 | +0.40 | +1.10 | 0.702 | 40.9% | +112 | +183 | — | 56.8% | +0.57 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.7 | -0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2541 | 181.1 | +0.40 | +1.10 | 0.702 | 40.9% | +21 | +17 | -276 | 78.2% | +2.32 | 102–45 (69%) | 69–52 (57%) | 102.4 | -2.62 | Career | 1882 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -67 | — | 49.0% | -0.10 | 27–19 (59%) | 13–16 (45%) | 103.8 | -1.48 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 18 | 3 | 21 | Mar 6, 2002 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 5 | 15 | 20 | Sep 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 17 | 1 | 18 | Mar 20, 2002 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 10 | 7 | 17 | Feb 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | 15 | 1 | 16 | Jun 5, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 20, 1992 | H2H |
| Linda Ferrando | 4 | 1 | 5 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 14, 1989 | H2H |
| Beverly Bowes | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 18, 1990 | H2H |
| Patty Fendick | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 29, 1990 | H2H |