H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Monica Seles vs Zina Garrison H2H: 4-2

Monica Seles holds a 4–2 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1992 Houston final 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 19, 1992* Houston WTA 250 F Clay Monica Seles #1 6-1 6-1 Zina Garrison #16 Match data
Nov 16, 1991* Philadelphia WTA 250 QF Carpet Monica Seles #1 7-6 6-0 Zina Garrison #12 Match data
Nov 3, 1990* Oakland WTA 250 SF Carpet Monica Seles #3 6-1 3-6 6-2 Zina Garrison #8 Match data
Jul 6, 1990* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Zina Garrison #5 3-6 6-3 9-7 Monica Seles #3 Match data
Jun 4, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Monica Seles #22 6-3 6-2 Zina Garrison #6 Match data
Feb 13, 1989 Washington WTA 250 SF Hard Zina Garrison #9 (w/o) Monica Seles #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15