H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Monique Javer vs Halle Cioffi H2H: 2-2
Monique Javer and Halle Cioffi are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monique Javer leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Halle Cioffi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Halle Cioffi won the 1991 Aurora fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 58
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1991* | Aurora | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Halle Cioffi | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | Monique Javer | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1990* | Scottsdale | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Monique Javer | 6-1 6-3 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1986* | Little Rock | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Halle Cioffi | 6-3 6-1 | Monique Javer | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1986* | Berkeley | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Monique Javer | 6-1 6-4 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monique Javer | #746 | #56 | 20 | 1,685 | 63 | 105 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monique Javer | Halle Cioffi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #73 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #72 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #185 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #779 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |