H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Monique Javer vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 0-2
Noelle Van Lottum holds a 2–0 lead over Monique Javer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Noelle Van Lottum leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Noelle Van Lottum won the 1992 Wellington semifinal 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 58
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1992* | Wellington | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Noelle Van Lottum | 7-6 6-4 | Monique Javer | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1991* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Noelle Van Lottum | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Monique Javer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monique Javer | #746 | #56 | 20 | 1,685 | 63 | 105 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Noelle Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,659 | 56 | 96 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monique Javer | Noelle Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #73 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #72 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #185 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #779 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |