H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 7-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 7–1 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2009 Madrid third round 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5).

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #10 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) Anna-Lena Groenefeld #53 Match data
Oct 12, 2006* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Nadia Petrova #5 6-2 6-2 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #18 Match data
Oct 6, 2006* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #7 6-3 6-4 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #18 Match data
Apr 15, 2006* Charleston WTA 1000 SF Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-1 6-3 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #15 Match data
Oct 6, 2005* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #9 6-3 6-2 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #19 Match data
Oct 1, 2005* Luxembourg WTA 500 QF Hard Anna-Lena Groenefeld #23 2-6 6-3 6-2 Nadia Petrova #9 Match data
Mar 12, 2004* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #12 7-5 6-3 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #109 Match data
Sep 26, 2003* Leipzig WTA 500 R16 Carpet Nadia Petrova #15 3-6 6-1 6-4 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #133 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #1,012 #14 1,365 1,856 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Nadia Petrova Anna-Lena Groenefeld
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0
1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0
2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,786 0 0
2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1
2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2007 4–14 22.2% #204 1,527 0 1
2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,596 0 1
2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1
2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1
2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1
2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13