H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-2

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 2–1 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2013 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-0 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data
Mar 24, 2010* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #18 6-3 7-6(7) Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 14, 2010* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 5-7 6-4 Nadia Petrova #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8