H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nana Smith vs Elena Pampoulova H2H: 0-1
Elena Pampoulova holds a 1–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Pampoulova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Pampoulova won the 1998 Roland Garros first round 3-6 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Elena Pampoulova | 3-6 6-0 6-1 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Pampoulova | — | — | — | 1,658 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nana Smith | Elena Pampoulova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–10 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |