H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Nana Smith vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 0-1

Emanuela Zardo holds a 1–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emanuela Zardo leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Emanuela Zardo won the 1991 Wimbledon round of 128 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Emanuela Zardo
SUI Age 56 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emanuela Zardo #32 6-0 6-3 Nana Smith #136 Match data Jun 26, 1991* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emanuela Zardo #976 #27 80 1,756 69 75 47.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nana Smith Emanuela Zardo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #258 1,488 0 0
18 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #283 1,476 0 0
19 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #142 1,449 0 0
20 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0 1990 13–12 52.0% #63 1,593 0 0
21 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0 1991 17–11 60.7% #31 1,714 0 1
22 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0 1992 18–15 54.5% #39 1,740 0 1
23 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0 1993 12–16 42.9% #73 1,650 0 1
24 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0 1994 9–13 40.9% #89 1,574 0 1
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #181 1,542 0 1
26 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nana Smith Emanuela Zardo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 6 5 11 54.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4% — 15 25 40 37.5% 49 38 87 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nana Smith Emanuela Zardo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11 1987 1488 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01
18 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50 1988 1477 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.05
19 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12 1989 1450 99.4 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — +0.13
20 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61 1990 1594 122.2 — — — — -34 -2 — 50.9% +0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 +0.71
21 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97 1991 1714 136.8 — — — — -190 +100 — 58.1% +0.87 4–2 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 101.3 +0.08
22 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20 1992 1741 131.9 — — — — -208 +113 — 51.4% -0.15 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 106.9 -0.32
23 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70 1993 1651 114.5 — — — — -126 +136 — 41.9% -0.50 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.1 +0.44
24 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66 1994 1575 109.2 — — — — -11 +87 — 41.7% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.56
25 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18 1995 1542 100.6 — — — — -20 — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.22
26 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21 — 1756 126.9 — — — — -99 +89 — 47.0% -0.14 20–13 (61%) 14–17 (45%) 105.2 +1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.