Nana Smith
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 17, 1998 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 20, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Yone Kamio | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 11, 1996 | H2H |
| Barbara Paulus | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 17, 1995 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Nana Smith vs Jing Jing Chen H2H: 1-0
Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Jing Jing Chen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1996 China Open round of 32 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nana Smith | 6-2 6-3 | Jing Jing Chen | Match data | Oct 17, 1996* | R32 | China Open | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jing Jing Chen | — | — | — | 1,521 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nana Smith | Jing Jing Chen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Nana Smith | Jing Jing Chen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1988 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 52 | 84 | 136 | 38.2% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | Career | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Nana Smith | Jing Jing Chen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1988 | 1496 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.11 | 1995 | 1509 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.01 |
| 1989 | 1588 | 139.3 | — | — | — | — | +6 | — | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.4 | -0.50 | 1996 | 1498 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 1990 | 1541 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | -2 | 38.9% | -0.89 | 1–5 (17%) | 5–4 (56%) | 96.2 | +1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1529 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 37.0% | -0.87 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1557 | 108.5 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | — | 52.6% | +0.32 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1444 | 90.0 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | — | 14.8% | -2.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.7 | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1579 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | -1 | — | — | 55.3% | +0.37 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1545 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | -88 | 40.8% | -0.65 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.5 | +0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1602 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 47.7% | -0.11 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–1 (75%) | 107.0 | +1.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1543 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 34.3% | -1.40 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1538 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | +45 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 1522 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 14.3% | -1.86 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1499 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1650 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | -45 | 40.4% | -0.69 | 28–43 (39%) | 20–20 (50%) | 98.5 | +2.21 | Career | 1522 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.86 | 1–0 | — | — | -1.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Jing Jing Chen
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nana Smith | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Kristin Godridge | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 29, 1995 | H2H |
| Karin Kschwendt | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 28, 1995 | H2H |