H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Nana Smith vs Linley Tanner H2H: 1-0

Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Linley Tanner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1990 Indian Wells Open round of 64 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Linley Tanner
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith #94 7-6 6-1 Linley Tanner Match data Feb 26, 1990 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linley Tanner — — — 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Nana Smith Linley Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,494 0 0
1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Nana Smith Linley Tanner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4% Career 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Nana Smith Linley Tanner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11 1986 1494 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.03
1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50 1990 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.08
1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21 Career 1500 101.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +2.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.