H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nana Smith vs Naoko Kijimuta H2H: 0-1
Naoko Kijimuta holds a 1–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Kijimuta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naoko Kijimuta won the 1996 Tokyo fourth round 2-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1996* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Naoko Kijimuta | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Naoko Kijimuta | #538 | #44 | 529 | 1,696 | 37 | 57 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nana Smith | Naoko Kijimuta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #45 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #74 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #279 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |