H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nana Smith vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 1-0

Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1996 Surabaya round of 32 3-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Noelle Van Lottum
FRA Age 54

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith #83 3-6 6-1 6-1 Noelle Van Lottum Match data Oct 10, 1996* R32 Surabaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Noelle Van Lottum — — — 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nana Smith Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–2 60.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% — 1,580 0 0
18 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,531 0 0
19 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0 1992 17–20 45.9% — 1,610 0 1
20 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0 1993 13–21 38.2% — 1,582 0 1
21 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0 1994 7–12 36.8% — 1,575 0 1
22 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0 1995 1–9 10.0% — 1,465 0 1
23 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% — 1,441 0 1
24 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0 1997 2–9 18.2% — 1,426 0 1
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0 1998 1–2 33.3% — 1,428 0 1
26 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,416 0 1
27 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nana Smith Noelle Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4% — 25 41 66 37.9% 22 40 62 35.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 9 7 16 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nana Smith Noelle Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1507 102.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.28
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1533 105.7 — — — — +43 — — 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.90
17 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11 1990 1581 116.6 — — — — +44 — — 60.0% -0.10 — 1–0 — +0.14
18 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50 1991 1532 111.1 — — — — +43 +16 — 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12 1992 1610 125.2 — — — — +39 -43 — 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96
20 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61 1993 1583 123.6 — — — — +35 -30 — 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33
21 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97 1994 1576 110.9 — — — — +14 +11 — 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) — — -0.09
22 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20 1995 1465 92.1 — — — — +55 +58 — 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 — +0.63
23 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70 1996 1442 96.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.13
24 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66 1997 1427 107.1 — — — — +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.01
25 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18 1998 1429 97.9 — — — — — +33 — 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.19
26 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08 1999 1416 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
27 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21 — 1646 119.1 — — — — +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.