H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nana Smith vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-1

Nana Smith and Sandra Cecchini are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay, while Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1998 Bol third round 6-1 6-7 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 30, 1998* Bol WTA 250 R32 Clay Sandra Cecchini #201 6-1 6-7 6-1 Nana Smith #99 Match data
Jan 17, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nana Smith #119 6-3 7-5 Sandra Cecchini #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nana Smith Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,586 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,540 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,529 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,558 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,445 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,545 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,602 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,537 0 0 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11