H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Nana Smith vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 0-1

Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1995 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-3 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nana Smith

JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H

0 – 1

1 main-draw meetings

Tami Whitlinger Jones

USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Tami Whitlinger Jones	6-3 2-6 6-1	Nana Smith #51	Match data	Feb 27, 1995	R32	Indian Wells Open	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Nana Smith	#669	#51	332	1,649	65	114	36.3%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Tami Whitlinger Jones	—	—	—	1,777	106	135	44.0%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Nana Smith							Tami Whitlinger Jones
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1988	0–1	0.0%	#201	1,495	0	0	1986	0–1	0.0%	—	1,493	0	0
18	1989	7–11	38.9%	#103	1,587	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1990	9–16	36.0%	#113	1,541	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1991	7–13	35.0%	#144	1,528	0	0	1989	4–5	44.4%	—	1,525	0	0
21	1992	4–4	50.0%	#118	1,557	0	0	1990	12–16	42.9%	—	1,576	0	0
22	1993	1–11	8.3%	#317	1,444	0	0	1991	17–18	48.6%	—	1,682	0	0
23	1994	9–7	56.2%	#58	1,578	0	0	1992	13–16	44.8%	—	1,644	0	0
24	1995	7–13	35.0%	#128	1,544	0	0	1993	13–19	40.6%	—	1,650	0	0
25	1996	13–13	50.0%	#70	1,601	0	0	1994	16–18	47.1%	—	1,709	0	0
26	1997	4–12	25.0%	#105	1,542	0	0	1995	19–18	51.4%	—	1,700	0	0
27	1998	4–8	33.3%	#117	1,538	0	0	1996	10–13	43.5%	—	1,694	0	0
28	1999	0–3	0.0%	#134	1,521	0	0	1997	2–11	15.4%	—	1,596	0	0
29	2000	0–2	0.0%	#218	1,499	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Nana Smith																	Tami Whitlinger Jones
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1988	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1986	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1989	5	9	14	35.7%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1990	6	11	17	35.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1991	4	8	12	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	1989	4	5	9	44.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1992	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	1990	8	8	16	50.0%	1	6	7	14.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	2	1	3	66.7%
22	1993	0	9	9	0.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1991	4	8	12	33.3%	8	5	13	61.5%	2	2	4	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%
23	1994	8	5	13	61.5%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1992	10	9	19	52.6%	3	4	7	42.9%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
24	1995	6	10	16	37.5%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	1993	11	10	21	52.4%	0	4	4	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	3	4	25.0%
25	1996	13	10	23	56.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1994	13	12	25	52.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	4	6	33.3%
26	1997	4	10	14	28.6%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1995	8	9	17	47.1%	7	5	12	58.3%	3	2	5	60.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
27	1998	3	5	8	37.5%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1996	4	6	10	40.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	1	4	75.0%
28	1999	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1997	1	5	6	16.7%	1	5	6	16.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
29	2000	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	52	84	136	38.2%	1	7	8	12.5%	4	13	17	23.5%	8	10	18	44.4%	—	63	73	136	46.3%	24	35	59	40.7%	7	12	19	36.8%	12	15	27	44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Nana Smith																Tami Whitlinger Jones
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1988	1496	102.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	—	—	-0.11	1986	1494	100.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-1.50	—	0–1	—	-0.05
18	1989	1588	139.3	—	—	—	—	+6	—	—	45.7%	-0.22	3–7 (30%)	1–2 (33%)	98.4	-0.50	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1990	1541	113.3	—	—	—	—	+33	—	-2	38.9%	-0.89	1–5 (17%)	5–4 (56%)	96.2	+1.12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1991	1529	118.1	—	—	—	—	+48	—	—	37.0%	-0.87	3–3 (50%)	0–1	—	+0.61	1989	1525	121.7	—	—	—	—	+38	—	—	52.4%	+0.24	0–3 (0%)	1–2 (33%)	96.3	+0.49
21	1992	1557	108.5	—	—	—	—	+41	—	—	52.6%	+0.32	3–2 (60%)	2–1 (67%)	—	+0.97	1990	1577	126.7	—	—	—	—	+71	-98	—	43.9%	-0.17	5–5 (50%)	1–6 (14%)	96.8	+0.78
22	1993	1444	90.0	—	—	—	—	+16	—	—	14.8%	-2.37	1–2 (33%)	1–3 (25%)	96.7	+0.20	1991	1682	133.2	—	—	—	—	-51	-22	-78	49.4%	-0.26	6–7 (46%)	8–2 (80%)	106.6	-0.08
23	1994	1579	128.2	—	—	—	—	-1	—	—	55.3%	+0.37	3–3 (50%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.70	1992	1645	120.9	—	—	—	—	+15	-10	—	41.0%	-0.59	4–1 (80%)	2–3 (40%)	102.8	-0.65
24	1995	1545	112.9	—	—	—	—	0	—	-88	40.8%	-0.65	3–6 (33%)	3–2 (60%)	98.5	+0.66	1993	1651	135.8	—	—	—	—	+45	-78	-87	41.7%	-0.75	4–6 (40%)	4–4 (50%)	99.7	-1.72
25	1996	1602	121.7	—	—	—	—	+24	—	—	47.7%	-0.11	8–5 (62%)	3–1 (75%)	107.0	+1.18	1994	1709	145.5	—	—	—	—	+28	—	—	45.8%	-0.15	3–5 (38%)	1–5 (17%)	97.5	-1.10
26	1997	1543	108.6	—	—	—	—	+33	—	—	34.3%	-1.40	1–4 (20%)	2–3 (40%)	95.7	-0.08	1995	1701	136.6	—	—	—	—	-14	-37	-134	53.8%	+0.30	6–11 (35%)	6–4 (60%)	96.8	-1.16
27	1998	1538	116.7	—	—	—	—	+45	—	—	40.0%	-1.00	2–4 (33%)	2–0	—	-0.13	1996	1694	132.0	—	—	—	—	+28	-56	—	42.3%	-0.48	4–2 (67%)	2–2 (50%)	103.6	-0.18
28	1999	1522	112.5	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	14.3%	-1.86	0–1	0–1	—	-0.63	1997	1596	120.8	—	—	—	—	+84	-20	—	25.8%	-1.55	1–4 (20%)	0–3 (0%)	93.1	-0.98
29	2000	1499	99.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-2.60	0–1	—	—	-0.03	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1650	124.0	—	—	—	—	+23	—	-45	40.4%	-0.69	28–43 (39%)	20–20 (50%)	98.5	+2.21	—	1778	139.7	—	—	—	—	+23	-42	-104	45.0%	-0.32	33–44 (43%)	25–32 (44%)	97.2	-1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Nana Smith's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Ai Sugiyama	0	4	4	Apr 17, 1998	H2H
Kimiko Date	1	3	4	Sep 20, 1996	H2H
Sabine Appelmans	1	2	3	Jun 26, 1996	H2H
Yone Kamio	1	2	3	Jan 11, 1996	H2H
Barbara Paulus	0	3	3	Nov 17, 1995	H2H

Tami Whitlinger Jones's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Amy Frazier	2	5	7	Aug 29, 1996	H2H
Sabine Appelmans	2	4	6	Jan 21, 1996	H2H
Ann Grossman	4	2	6	Jun 30, 1995	H2H
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario	0	6	6	Jan 20, 1995	H2H
Lindsay Davenport	1	4	5	Jun 25, 1997	H2H