H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nana Smith vs Yone Kamio H2H: 1-2
Yone Kamio holds a 2–1 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yone Kamio leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1996 Hobart third round 6-7 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1996* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nana Smith | 6-7 7-5 6-0 | Yone Kamio | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1995* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yone Kamio | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Nana Smith | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1994* | Taipei | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Yone Kamio | 6-2 6-2 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yone Kamio | #253 | #24 | 191 | 1,787 | 43 | 51 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nana Smith | Yone Kamio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #133 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #108 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #28 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #119 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |