H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Nancy Neviaser vs Cathleen Farrell H2H: 1-0

Nancy Neviaser holds a 1–0 lead over Cathleen Farrell in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Nancy Neviaser won the 1981 Curitiba round of 32 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nancy Neviaser
USA Age 68
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Cathleen Farrell
USA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Neviaser 6-0 6-2 Cathleen Farrell Match data Apr 16, 1981* R32 Curitiba WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nancy Neviaser — — — 1,565 9 11 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cathleen Farrell — — — 1,500 4 17 19.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nancy Neviaser Cathleen Farrell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1981 5–4 55.6% — 1,520 0 0 1980 1–6 14.3% — 1,441 0 0
24 1982 4–7 36.4% — 1,533 0 0 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,381 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1982 3–6 33.3% — 1,385 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nancy Neviaser Cathleen Farrell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 1981 1520 106.7 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.55 0–2 — — +0.26 1980 1441 89.8 — — — — +63 — — 23.1% -2.39 0–1 — — +0.14
24 1982 1534 107.1 — — — — — -44 +97 44.0% -0.80 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.7 +0.27 1981 1381 91.0 — — — — — — — 9.1% -2.36 0–1 0–2 — +0.07
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1385 101.9 — — — — +83 +168 — 42.1% -0.21 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +1.22
Career — 1565 106.9 — — — — — -44 +97 51.1% -0.20 0–5 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 94.4 +2.65 — 1500 93.2 — — — — +73 +168 — 27.9% -1.42 1–4 (20%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 +7.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.