H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nancy Richey vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 2-0
Nancy Richey holds a 2–0 lead over Betty Ann Grubb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1973 Tucson third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1973* | Tucson | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-2 6-2 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1971* | Chicago | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-2 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nancy Richey | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |