H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nancy Richey vs Brigette Cuypers H2H: 2-0
Nancy Richey holds a 2–0 lead over Brigette Cuypers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1976 Chicago third round 6-4 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 70
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 1976* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nancy Richey | 6-4 2-0 (ret.) | Brigette Cuypers | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1975* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nancy Richey | 0-6 6-2 6-0 | Brigette Cuypers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
| Brigette Cuypers | — | — | — | 1,833 | 99 | 100 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nancy Richey | Brigette Cuypers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 14–11 | 56.0% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |