H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nancy Richey vs Jeanne Evert H2H: 3-1
Nancy Richey holds a 3–1 lead over Jeanne Evert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1976 Amelia Island fourth round 6-4 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1976* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Jeanne Evert | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1975* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Jeanne Evert | 6-7(7) 7-5 4-2 (ret.) | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1973* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-0 6-2 | Jeanne Evert | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1972* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-4 6-2 | Jeanne Evert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
| Jeanne Evert | — | — | — | 1,929 | 132 | 90 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nancy Richey | Jeanne Evert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 9 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |