H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nancy Richey vs Linda Tuero H2H: 4-1
Nancy Richey holds a 4–1 lead over Linda Tuero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Linda Tuero won the 1970 Indianapolis semifinal 9-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
Age 75
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1970* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Linda Tuero | 9-7 7-5 | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1970* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-2 6-3 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
| May 4, 1969* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Nancy Richey | 7-5 6-2 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1968* | Milwaukee | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-3 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1968* | Houston | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-4 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nancy Richey | Linda Tuero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |