H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nancy Richey vs Tam Oshaughnessy H2H: 3-0
Nancy Richey holds a 3–0 lead over Tam Oshaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1972 Richmond third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1972* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-2 6-1 | Tam Oshaughnessy | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1968* | Milwaukee | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-2 6-1 | Tam Oshaughnessy | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1968* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-0 6-1 | Tam Oshaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
| Tam Oshaughnessy | — | — | — | 1,500 | 16 | 51 | 23.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nancy Richey | Tam Oshaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 | 1968 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 | 1969 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 | 1971 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,387 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 | 1972 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 | 1974 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |