H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Nancy Yeargin vs Annabel Croft H2H: 0-1

Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Yeargin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1983 Beckenham round of 32 6-7 6-4 6-3.

USA Age 71 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 6-7 6-4 6-3 Nancy Yeargin Match data Jun 2, 1983* R32 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nancy Yeargin 1,667 42 73 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annabel Croft 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nancy Yeargin Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
14 1981 9–5 64.3% 1,535 0 0
15 1982 14–9 60.9% 1,588 0 0
16 1983 6–7 46.2% 1,595 0 0
17 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0 1984 11–14 44.0% 1,615 0 0
18 1985 23–20 53.5% 1,761 0 1
19 1974 0–2 0.0% 1,452 0 0 1986 10–19 34.5% 1,653 0 1
20 1975 0–4 0.0% 1,410 0 0 1987 8–14 36.4% 1,574 0 1
21 1976 2–2 50.0% 1,431 0 0 1988 3–3 50.0% 1,562 0 1
22 1977 1–2 33.3% 1,438 0 0
23 1978 7–3 70.0% 1,554 0 0
24 1979 2–6 25.0% 1,533 0 0
25 1980 2–8 20.0% 1,490 0 0
26 1981 6–7 46.2% 1,568 0 0
27 1982 11–17 39.3% 1,637 0 0
28 1983 8–15 34.8% 1,556 0 0
29 1984 3–6 33.3% 1,552 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nancy Yeargin Annabel Croft
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
20 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
24 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1980 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1983 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 11 21 32 34.4% 1 11 12 8.3% 23 23 46 50.0% 3 12 15 20.0% 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nancy Yeargin Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.31
14 1981 1535 118.4 +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 +0.81
15 1982 1589 120.1 +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 +2.10
16 1983 1595 118.1 -29 +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.87
17 1972 1484 97.8 0.0% -2.50 +0.23 1984 1615 118.2 -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 1985 1762 133.2 +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
19 1974 1453 96.0 0.0% -2.50 +0.36 1986 1653 120.6 +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
20 1975 1411 92.9 11.1% -3.00 0–1 0–1 +0.17 1987 1575 108.2 +47 -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
21 1976 1431 102.6 55.6% -0.33 0–1 +0.09 1988 1562 97.6 +29 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) +0.72
22 1977 1439 112.0 33.3% -0.67 -0.27
23 1978 1554 127.3 +103 65.2% +1.39 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.90
24 1979 1534 102.7 +33 23.5% -1.47 1–0 +0.63
25 1980 1490 105.7 -15 +123 22.7% -1.14 1–1 1–5 (17%) +0.35
26 1981 1568 127.4 -36 +97 46.4% +0.21 1–1 2–0 +0.18
27 1982 1638 118.5 -118 +49 38.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 104.4 -0.53
28 1983 1557 103.8 -52 +122 36.5% -1.13 3–3 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 101.5 +2.29
29 1984 1552 109.3 -32 33.3% -1.28 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.22
Career 1667 117.6 -53 +89 37.3% -0.79 14–11 (56%) 10–12 (45%) 104.9 +4.02 1780 125.1 +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.