Nannan Liu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Zvonareva | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Gisela Dulko | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 13, 2005 | H2H |
| Kristina Brandi | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 30, 2004 | H2H |
| Paola Suarez | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 1, 2004 | H2H |
| Jie Zheng | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 12, 2002 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Nannan Liu vs Paola Suarez H2H: 0-1
Paola Suarez holds a 1–0 lead over Nannan Liu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paola Suarez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2004 US Open round of 128 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paola Suarez | 6-1 7-5 | Nannan Liu | Match data | Sep 1, 2004* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nannan Liu | #607 | #141 | 246 | 1,500 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,913 | 224 | 182 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nannan Liu | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #36 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,858 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #16 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,695 | 0 | 4 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nannan Liu | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 21 | 2004 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 72 | 80 | 152 | 47.4% | 137 | 82 | 219 | 62.6% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nannan Liu | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1519 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | 66.7% | +1.17 | — | — | — | +0.38 |
| 18 | 2001 | 1484 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.11 | 1994 | 1536 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +102 | — | 41.4% | -0.86 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.29 |
| 19 | 2002 | 1469 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 1995 | 1522 | 118.6 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +115 | — | 28.6% | -0.86 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1618 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | -93 | +76 | — | 50.0% | -0.08 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.1 | +1.09 |
| 21 | 2004 | 1457 | 103.2 | +0.68 | -0.54 | 0.734 | 43.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.26 | 1997 | 1555 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | -22 | +67 | — | 33.3% | -1.35 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.8 | +0.40 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1449 | 106.1 | +0.94 | +0.23 | 0.715 | 42.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | -0.33 | 1998 | 1534 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +87 | — | 50.0% | +0.29 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.3 | +3.05 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1596 | 122.0 | — | — | — | — | -100 | +73 | — | 47.4% | -0.07 | 6–3 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 103.6 | +0.07 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1676 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -179 | +128 | -157 | 54.0% | +0.41 | 8–11 (42%) | 5–7 (42%) | 99.5 | -0.08 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1736 | 140.5 | — | — | — | — | -153 | +171 | — | 58.1% | +0.80 | 8–0 (100%) | 4–6 (40%) | 105.8 | +1.00 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1693 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +227 | — | 57.4% | +0.57 | 8–12 (40%) | 5–1 (83%) | 98.3 | -0.89 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1859 | 149.0 | +1.97 | +3.59 | 1.211 | 54.4% | -98 | +75 | -262 | 60.0% | +0.72 | 12–11 (52%) | 5–2 (71%) | 105.6 | +0.59 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1797 | 134.6 | +1.65 | +4.08 | 1.230 | 54.7% | -92 | +170 | -111 | 63.6% | +0.92 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–5 (44%) | 98.6 | +2.55 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1731 | 112.0 | -0.77 | +0.57 | 0.918 | 46.7% | -109 | +222 | — | 40.0% | -0.45 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1707 | 121.7 | -2.09 | -0.88 | 0.897 | 47.5% | -61 | +168 | +8 | 58.8% | +0.18 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | -0.50 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1696 | 110.9 | -0.19 | -2.20 | 1.107 | 52.1% | -44 | — | — | 58.3% | +1.08 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.05 |
| Career | — | 1500 | 103.5 | +0.81 | -0.16 | 0.725 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 7.7% | -2.08 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -6.33 | — | 1914 | 139.3 | +0.87 | +2.37 | 1.135 | 52.9% | -101 | +132 | -137 | 54.3% | +0.35 | 62–57 (52%) | 37–37 (50%) | 101.9 | +1.91 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Paola Suarez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Schnyder | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 4, 2006 | H2H |
| Fabiola Zuluaga | 3 | 4 | 7 | Aug 18, 2004 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 10, 2004 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 4 | 2 | 6 | Oct 7, 2004 | H2H |
| Elena Likhovtseva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 2, 2003 | H2H |